01
Who bears the risk, in practice
There are three relationships in every failed delivery and they resolve independently, which is the fact that makes this manageable.
- You and the buyer. In consumer selling, the seller is generally responsible for the item until the buyer has it. Marketplace protection programmes are built on that assumption, and consumer law in many jurisdictions puts transit risk on the seller regardless of what your terms say.
- You and the carrier. A separate commercial relationship, governed by their terms, their compensation limits, their evidence requirements, and their claim deadlines.
- You and the platform. Which decides disputes, mostly on tracking evidence, and records the outcome against your account.
The commercial consequence is that carrier compensation is a partial recovery, not your protection. Your protection is choosing services whose evidence and cover match the value at risk, which is a decision made at dispatch — see postage strategy.
02
When a parcel has not arrived
Most "lost" parcels are late. Distinguishing between the two quickly is what keeps this cheap.
- Read the tracking properly before replying Look for the last scan, its location, and whether the parcel is moving. A parcel scanned into a hub two days ago is delayed; one with no movement for two weeks is lost. Customs holds on international shipments routinely show no movement for extended periods and then complete normally.
- Reply the same day with specifics Tell the buyer exactly what you can see, what you are doing, and when you will next update them. Vague reassurance produces escalation; a concrete plan and a date almost never does.
- Give it the carrier's stated window before declaring it lost Carriers will not accept a claim before their own timescale, and a meaningful share of parcels arrive inside it. Tell the buyer that window explicitly so waiting feels like a process rather than a delay.
- Open the carrier claim as soon as you are eligible Claim windows are finite and start from dispatch or expected delivery. Sellers lose recoverable money by waiting to see whether the buyer complains.
- Resolve the buyer at the end of the window, whatever the carrier has said Refund or replace. Replacing is often better where you have another unit: the buyer gets what they wanted, the sale stands, and it costs you the item rather than the item plus the revenue.
- Record the incident against the route and service One loss is noise. A pattern by destination, service, or item type is actionable, and it is invisible unless you write it down.
03
Marked delivered but not received
This is the most uncomfortable case, because the tracking says one thing and a possibly honest buyer says another. Both can be true — parcels are misdelivered to neighbours, left in unexpected places, and taken from doorsteps.
- Assume good faith first. The overwhelming majority of these are genuine, and treating a real buyer as a suspected fraudster is expensive in feedback and standing.
- Ask the carrier for delivery detail. GPS coordinates, a photograph, the exact scan location, or the signature. Carriers hold more information than the public tracking page shows, and it frequently resolves the question outright.
- Ask the buyer to check the obvious places. Neighbours, other household members, safe places, reception or post rooms, and any local depot notice. A large share resolve here.
- If the delivery data contradicts the tracking, treat it as a misdelivery and pursue the carrier. This is a legitimate claim, and it is what the detailed delivery evidence is for.
- If it is genuinely ambiguous, resolve it in the buyer's favour and move on. Platform dispute outcomes generally follow the buyer where they claim non-receipt, and fighting one produces a case decided against you — which costs more than the item through seller standing.
- Change the service, not the policy. If this recurs, use signature or a service with photographic proof of delivery above a value threshold. That is the actual fix.
A small number of buyers do exploit this, and it is genuinely irritating. It is still cheaper to absorb the occasional abuse than to build a fulfilment policy around suspecting everyone, because the policy costs you on every honest order while the abuse costs you on a handful.
04
When it arrives damaged
Damage claims are decided on evidence about the packing, not on the fact of the damage. Carriers routinely decline claims where they judge protection inadequate, which is why the documentation habit in packing fragile and high-value items pays for itself.
- Ask for photographs immediately, before the packaging is disturbed further The outer box, the packing material, and the item. External damage to the box is what establishes transit as the cause rather than the item having been sent broken.
- Tell the buyer to keep everything Carriers frequently inspect, and disposal of the packaging ends the claim. Say this in your first message, because packaging goes in the bin within hours otherwise.
- Resolve the buyer now Refund, replace, or agree a partial refund if the damage is cosmetic and they would rather keep it. Partial refunds are often the best outcome for everyone and they preserve the sale.
- File the carrier claim with your own evidence Your pre-shipment condition photographs, your packing photographs, the buyer's damage photographs, proof of value, and proof of posting. Claims fail on missing evidence far more often than on merit.
- Decide whether to recover the item For low-value goods, having it returned costs more than it recovers. For high-value ones, the item may be repairable or worth something for parts, and the carrier may require it for inspection.
- Change the packing method for that category If an item type breaks twice, the method is wrong. Resolving to be more careful is not a change; a new standard method is.
05
Running a claim that actually succeeds
| Requirement | What sellers get wrong |
|---|---|
| Proof of posting | Assumed to be in an email somewhere. Keep it attached to the order record from the start. |
| Proof of value | The sale price alone is sometimes insufficient; carriers may ask for cost evidence. Purchase records matter here. |
| Evidence of adequate packing | The most common reason a damage claim is refused, and the easiest to supply if photographing is routine. |
| Claim within the deadline | Windows are short and start earlier than sellers expect. Diarise it when the incident opens, not when it concludes. |
| Correct claimant | Generally the account that bought the postage. Where a platform or broker bought the label, the claim usually runs through them. |
| Compensation limits | Default cover is often much lower than the item's value. Cover above it must normally be bought at dispatch and cannot be added afterwards. |
| Excluded items | Many carriers exclude or limit cover for glass, ceramics, electronics, and collectables — precisely the categories most likely to break. Read the exclusions for what you actually ship. |
Treat claims as a small routine rather than an occasional battle. A folder per incident, the evidence gathered as it arrives, and a note of the deadline is enough. Sellers who do this recover a meaningful share of what they lose; sellers who improvise recover very little and conclude that claims never work.
06
Treating failures as a measurable cost
The final step is to stop treating each failure as an anomaly. At any volume, loss and damage form a rate, and a rate can be priced, reduced, and monitored.
- Log every incident with the item, category, destination, service, cause, cost to you, and whether the claim recovered anything.
- Compute a failure rate per category and per service. This is the number that belongs in your pricing and in your bid ceiling when buying stock.
- Look for concentration. Most sellers find failures cluster in one category, one route, or one service rather than spreading evenly. Concentration is good news, because it means one change fixes most of it.
- Compare the cost of prevention against the cost of failure. Upgrading a service or a box size across a category is worth it precisely when it costs less than the incidents it removes — and you can only know that with the log.
- Watch the standing impact, not just the money. These incidents generate the case and defect metrics that affect visibility and fees, so their true cost exceeds the refunds.
- Review quarterly and act on one thing. The single largest contributor, changed properly, beats a general resolution to do better.
07
Practice
Exercise
Write your first reply in advance
- Draft your standard first reply for a parcel that has not arrived.
- It should resolve the buyer without conceding anything that would undermine a carrier claim.
- Save it where you can reach it in under ten seconds, because speed is what decides these.
Check yourself
A parcel is lost. Should you wait for the carrier claim before refunding the buyer?
No. Resolve the buyer first and pursue the carrier separately. Coupling the two makes the buyer wait on a process they are not party to, which produces an escalated case and a poor review — and cases closed without seller resolution are among the most heavily weighted measures on most platforms. The carrier claim is your problem, not theirs.
What single habit most improves your odds on a damage claim?
Photographing the packed item before you seal the box. Claims are decided on evidence of adequate packing, and that evidence can only be created at packing time — it cannot be reconstructed once the parcel has been opened at the other end. It costs seconds per parcel.
Progress is saved in this browser only. No account, nothing sent anywhere.
08
Common questions
How long should I wait before accepting a parcel is lost?
Use the carrier's own stated timescale for declaring loss, because they will not accept a claim earlier and a real share of parcels arrive within it. Tell the buyer that window at the first message so the wait is a stated process rather than a delay. International shipments need considerably longer, since customs clearance regularly produces silent gaps in tracking.
Do I have to refund if tracking shows delivered?
Platform protection often favours the seller where tracking shows delivery, but the outcomes vary by programme and by the evidence available, and the buyer's consumer rights may be a separate matter. Practically, request detailed delivery evidence from the carrier first — location data or a photograph frequently settles it — and weigh a contested win against the cost to your standing. Resolving genuinely ambiguous cases in the buyer's favour is usually the cheaper outcome.
Is carrier insurance worth buying?
It depends on the gap between the item's value and the default compensation, and on your measured failure rate for that category and service. Below the default cover there is nothing to buy. Well above it, you are self-insuring by default. Note that additional cover typically still excludes inadequately packed parcels and certain fragile categories, so it complements good packing rather than replacing it.
Can I ask the buyer to claim from the carrier?
Generally no. The contract for carriage is between you and the carrier because you bought the service, so the claim is yours to make. More importantly, the buyer's contract is with you, and directing them elsewhere reads as avoidance — it is one of the fastest routes to an escalated case and a negative.
What if the same buyer reports problems repeatedly?
Resolve each incident on its merits, but keep a record. A genuine pattern across multiple orders from one buyer is worth reporting to the platform with the evidence rather than confronting directly, and you can decline future business from that account. Treat it as a rare exception, not as a reason to change how you handle the majority of honest claims.