01
Why sellers are exposed at all
The asymmetry is built into distance selling. You dispatch a physical item, and the payment that pays for it stays reversible for some time afterwards — through the platform's own dispute process, through the payment provider, and through the card scheme behind it. The goods are gone and the money is provisional.
Three separate mechanisms can take money back after you have shipped, and they are easy to confuse:
| Mechanism | Who decides | What matters |
|---|---|---|
| Platform dispute | The marketplace, under its own policy. | Fastest and most common. Decided largely on tracking, the description, and your messages. Handled in the disputes guide. |
| Payment provider claim | The payment company. | Slower, evidence-driven, and often runs on a longer window than the platform's own. |
| Card chargeback | The buyer's bank, under card scheme rules. | The longest window and the least visibility. Often arrives months later. Proof of delivery to the order address is the main defence. |
You can lose a chargeback on a transaction the platform already resolved in your favour, because the two processes are separate and answer to different rules. That is unwelcome and it is worth knowing in advance.
02
What the attacks actually look like
A small number of patterns account for most seller losses. Recognising the shape early is most of the defence.
- The address change. An order arrives, then a message asks you to ship somewhere else. Frequently a compromised account. Shipping to any address other than the one on the order usually voids seller protection outright.
- The return swap. A return arrives containing a broken, older, or entirely different unit. Defeated only by evidence created before dispatch: serial numbers recorded, contents photographed, weight on the receipt.
- The empty box. A claim that the parcel arrived empty or containing something worthless. The counter is the photograph of the packed parcel and the dispatch weight.
- Off-platform payment. A request to complete the deal outside the marketplace, usually with a plausible reason. This removes every protection you have and is against the rules of essentially every platform, so it also risks your account under the policy rules.
- The overpayment. A payment for more than the price with a request to refund the difference. The original payment reverses later; the refund does not.
- Friendly fraud. A genuine buyer who received the item and files a chargeback anyway. Indistinguishable from a real dispute at the outset, and the reason proof of delivery to the order address is the foundation of everything.
- Phishing aimed at your account. Convincing messages that appear to come from the marketplace, asking you to sign in. Losing account access is worse than losing an item.
03
Seller protection is real, and conditional
Platforms and payment providers do offer seller protection, and it does pay out. It is also narrower than the marketing suggests, and the conditions are procedural rather than moral — you can be entirely in the right and still fall outside them.
The conditions that recur across providers, stated generally because the specifics differ and change:
- Ship to the address on the order, unchanged.
- Use a service with tracking, and upload the tracking to the order rather than keeping it in an email.
- Meet the handling time. A dispatch scan after the deadline weakens both your protection and your metrics.
- For higher-value items, use a service that captures a signature. What counts as higher value is defined by the provider and worth knowing before you need it.
- Describe the item accurately. Protection against not-as-described claims generally does not survive a description that was optimistic.
- Respond inside the window. Many claims are lost by default rather than on the facts.
Read your own platform's current terms rather than relying on any summary, including this one. They change, they differ by country, and they differ by category — high-value electronics and collectables often carry specific extra conditions.
04
Evidence has to exist before the dispute
This is the operative principle of the whole chapter, and it is why fraud defence is a packing-bench habit rather than a customer-service skill. Once a claim is open, the set of facts you can prove is already fixed.
- Photograph serials before packing Photograph any serial, IMEI, or unique marking before packing, with the number legible. Record it on the item record too.
- Photograph the contents Photograph the packed contents before sealing — the same habit the packing guide asks for, doing double duty here.
- Photograph the sealed parcel Photograph the sealed, labelled parcel.
- Keep the weighed receipt Keep the postage receipt showing the weight. A returned parcel weighing noticeably less than the one you sent is unusually persuasive.
- Keep conversation on the platform Keep all conversation on the platform, where it forms part of the record automatically.
- File it against the SKU File the lot against the SKU, so retrieving it months later takes seconds rather than an afternoon.
For most inventory this is thirty seconds per order. Apply it in full to the items where a loss would actually hurt, and lightly to the rest — the objective is proportionate protection, not a forensic archive of every paperback.
05
Payment holds, reserves, and why funds are delayed
A payment hold is not an accusation, and treating it as one wastes energy. It is the platform managing exactly the exposure this chapter describes: they are liable if you take the money and fail to ship.
Holds are more likely when:
- The account is new, or has been dormant and has just resumed selling.
- Selling volume or item value has changed sharply.
- You have moved into a category with a higher dispute rate.
- Recent metrics have worsened — open cases, late dispatch, cancellations.
- The buyer has opened a dispute, in which case the funds for that order are usually held pending resolution.
What shortens them is boring and effective: dispatch promptly, upload tracking to the order, keep dispute rates low, and let the account age. What does not work is arguing, opening additional accounts, or waiting to ship until the money clears — that last one causes late dispatch, which extends the hold.
06
Keeping the defence proportionate
Fraud losses feel far worse than an equivalent postage overspend, because they are somebody's deliberate act. That emotional weight leads sellers into defences that cost more than the thing they prevent.
- Measure the actual rate. Record every loss with its cause. Most sellers discover the annual total is smaller than they assume and concentrated in one category.
- Scale effort to value. Full evidence and signed-for delivery on the expensive items; tracking and a photograph on everything else; nothing elaborate on low-value stock.
- Do not become hostile to real buyers. Restrictive rules, suspicious messages, and refusing ordinary requests cost you sales and reviews continuously, while fraud costs occasionally. Almost everyone is honest.
- Accept some losses as a cost of trade. Contesting a small claim can cost more in time, postage, and account risk than paying it, and that arithmetic is the same one the disputes guide applies.
- Protect the account above the item. A restriction costs more than any single parcel. Anything that risks standing to save one sale is a bad trade.
One exception worth stating clearly: account security is not proportionate to item value, because losing account access loses everything at once. Unique passwords, two-factor authentication, and never signing in from a link in a message are not optional at any scale.
07
Practice
Exercise
Test your own evidence trail
- Pick a sale you shipped in the last month. Pretend a claim has just been opened saying the item never arrived and was not as described.
- Gather everything you could submit: photographs of the item, of the packed parcel, the tracking record, the address used, the messages.
- Note what you cannot produce. That gap is your actual exposure.
- Change one habit this week so the missing item exists next time.
Check yourself
A buyer asks you to ship to a different address than the one on the order, saying they made a mistake. Why is that a problem even if the request is genuine?
Because seller protection on almost every platform is conditional on shipping to the address on the order, and shipping elsewhere generally removes it entirely — including against a claim from the real account holder, who may have had nothing to do with the request. It is also the standard shape of a compromised-account attack: the order is placed with stolen credentials and redirected before the owner notices. The safe answer is always the same: cancel and relist so the buyer can reorder correctly. It is mildly inconvenient and it costs you nothing.
Why does a returned item that is not the item you sent so often end with the seller losing?
Because the dispute reduces to your word against theirs unless you created evidence in advance. Once the box is opened at the other end, nothing about the original contents can be proved retroactively. The sellers who win these have serial numbers photographed and recorded before dispatch, a photograph of the packed parcel, and a weight on the postage receipt that contradicts what came back. All three have to exist before the item leaves.
Progress is saved in this browser only. No account, nothing sent anywhere.
08
Common questions
Should I ever ship to a different address than the one on the order?
No. Seller protection is generally conditional on the address on the order, and shipping elsewhere usually removes it — including against a claim from the genuine account holder. Cancel and ask the buyer to reorder with the correct address.
What can I do about a return that came back as a different item?
Only what you did before dispatch. Serial numbers photographed and recorded, the packed contents photographed, and the dispatch weight on the receipt are what turn this from your word against theirs into a case with evidence. After the fact there is very little available.
Is a chargeback the same as a platform dispute?
No. A platform dispute is decided by the marketplace under its own policy; a chargeback is decided by the buyer's bank under card scheme rules, on a much longer window. You can lose a chargeback on a transaction the platform already resolved in your favour.
Why are my funds on hold?
Usually because the platform is managing its exposure: new or newly reactivated accounts, sharp changes in volume or value, higher-risk categories, worsening metrics, or an open dispute. Prompt dispatch with tracking uploaded to the order is what shortens them; delaying shipment until funds clear makes them worse.
How much fraud should I expect?
Less than it feels like, and concentrated in particular categories and price points. Record every loss with its cause for a year — the total is usually smaller than the cost of the defences sellers put up in response, which is why proportionality matters.